InstantForum.NET v4.1.3New Boundary Support Forumhttp://www.nbtnet.newboundary.com/forum/support@newboundary.comWed, 15 Oct 2008 22:36:17 GMT20http://www.nbtnet.newboundary.com/forum/Topic1049-11-1.aspxWith the version 8 release, we focused on adding functionality to the Prism client and the Package Editor to support the Windows Vista platform. We appreciate your suggestions for improving the product, and we will pass them along to our Product Manager for consideration as planning begins for the next release.Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:43:37 GMTNew Boundary Supporthttp://www.nbtnet.newboundary.com/forum/Topic1049-11-1.aspxI have explored Prism Deploy 8.0 but see nothing yet to help define the sequence Prism installs packages listed in a group</P><P>Are there any plans to add such a feature and if so when may they become available?Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:20:01 GMTAndy Ramptonhttp://www.nbtnet.newboundary.com/forum/Topic1049-11-1.aspxThank you for your feedback and suggestions. We hope to be able to address this in a future release.Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:42:00 GMTNew Boundary Supporthttp://www.nbtnet.newboundary.com/forum/Topic1049-11-1.aspx<P>It would be really good if Prism Deploy can force clients to install assigned tasks in Task Name order as shown in the Console (when listing tasks in Task Name ascending order)</P><P>Users could then sequence Tasks by giving each Tasks a unique Numeric/Alphabetical name that sorts into the sequence the users wishes packages installed</P><P>Using inter linked Configuration Groupings to force installs to start depending on what previous packages are installed is very difficult and time consuming to manage with many packages and seems to give unpredictable results</P><P>Longer term a proper dependancy/priority/sequence assigned to each task would be great</P>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:52:00 GMTAndy Rampton